• @SkyeStarfall
    link
    English
    258 months ago

    Are the meat substitutes actually bad, though? Certainly can’t be worse than normal fast food.

    • @mortalic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      148 months ago

      Assuming you’re asking about things like impossible and beyond meat. They are generally not “healthy” but one stark difference is they don’t have cholesterol.

      • @SkyeStarfall
        link
        English
        158 months ago

        Whether something is healthy or not is very contentious in the first place, especially with how much misinformation there is out there.

        I just try to read the labels on the replacements I buy, and most of them just have many random vegetables and stuff, with a seemingly good balance in nutrients and so on. Maybe there is stuff I’m missing, but I don’t see much bad that can be in there.

        I think the most important thing is to just have a relatively balanced diet.

      • Fushuan [he/him]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        I’d say that they are as healthy as the burger king meat they are substituting. I wouldn’t eat either but if you are there, picking either is equally bad so whatever.

    • Ser Salty
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      68 months ago

      The unhealthiest part about them is just gonna be that they’re salty, fried and greasy, just like other fast food. It’s just a lump of plant fibres (usually peas or wheat these days, I find) thrown in a frier.

    • @Floey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      Yeah they are better than fast food, even the fast food is healthier if you sub the meat. But that is a terrible benchmark to use.

      Compare these meat substitutes to the humble bean and it’s no contest.