Sophocles@infosec.pub to 196English · edit-23 个月前Appimage ruleinfosec.pubimagemessage-square31linkfedilinkarrow-up1151file-text
arrow-up1151imageAppimage ruleinfosec.pubSophocles@infosec.pub to 196English · edit-23 个月前message-square31linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareHappyFroglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·3 个月前I find different formats good for different purposes. Apps I use frequently are flatpak, single use apps are appimage, and apps that need more privileges gets to be system packages.
minus-squareSophocles@infosec.pubOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·3 个月前In general I agree, I love me some appimage, but Flatpak is good when you need sandboxes and repo packages are super easy with apt or dnf
minus-squareSamueru_sama@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 个月前 but Flatpak is good when you need sandboxes flatpak sandbox is actually bad for web-browsers and electron apps: https://librewolf.net/installation/linux/#security https://seirdy.one/notes/2022/06/12/flatpak-and-web-browsers/ https://github.com/uazo/cromite/issues/1053#issuecomment-2191794660
I find different formats good for different purposes. Apps I use frequently are flatpak, single use apps are appimage, and apps that need more privileges gets to be system packages.
In general I agree, I love me some appimage, but Flatpak is good when you need sandboxes and repo packages are super easy with apt or dnf
flatpak sandbox is actually bad for web-browsers and electron apps:
https://librewolf.net/installation/linux/#security
https://seirdy.one/notes/2022/06/12/flatpak-and-web-browsers/
https://github.com/uazo/cromite/issues/1053#issuecomment-2191794660