• WillStealYourUsernameOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unfortunately it’s not nearly decentralized enough to be good in the long run. Wish people would go to mastodon instead.

    • verdare [he/him]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t really see Mastodon “catching on” in the mainstream unless BlueSky fucks something up big time. So much of a social network’s success is determined by, uh, network effects.

      BlueSky happened to be in the right place at the right time and got a critical influx of influential users, and Mastodon just didn’t.

      • nublug
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        it didn’t ‘happen in the right time’ and all that shit; it had advertising paid for by investors. and also the viral 'mastodon’s tooo haaaarrd to understand for my wee wittle dumb baby brain" campaign. no way that dumb shit was organic.

        • TotallynotJessicaM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s harder for microblogging platforms because a huge draw is having notable people and celebs. Those individuals are the content more than content itself. Popular posters is easier for the corpos to monetize than quality posts and discussion.

      • WillStealYourUsernameOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah. People are gonna trap themselves in centralized corpo platforms forever until they learn to value free media and decentralization