• abbiistabbii
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 年前

    A very Georgist view, but a lot of companies are just scummy and want to make the most profit possible.

    • Zyansheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 年前

      Sure, but at least companies can be competed with and if they get too big, are subject to government scrutiny. On the other hand, its really hard to control a large population of landowners and speculators who have a personal incentive to do whatever they can to increase the perceived price of their owned land.

      • TaterTurnipTulip@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 年前

        This is a very Polyannaish take and places way too much faith in a “free market” and government oversight. There is no free market when we are regularly allowing companies to get massive and become practical monopolies. When was the last time a company faced serious repercussions for getting too big?

        There is certainly some more competition among smaller, local businesses. And the price of land/real estate can be an issue for them. But I would also ask to see how much the business owner is making in relation to their employees.

        All that being said, I would like to see landownership completely overhauled, if not abolished.