I believe there has to be a better way to refer to our community than an initialism list approach, which is structurally exclusive: that’s why we’ve seen various groups rightfully seek increased recognition and try to change the most popular term - LGBT, LGBTQ, LGBTQIA+ and literally dozens of other variants. That indicates that an initialism is an exclusive, rather than inclusive, route which will always fail to represent everyone as our understanding of sex, sexuality and gender change over time, and it possibly encourages accidental erasure.

Are there any recognized alternatives which capture the full breadth of this community?

  • Explicit terms are particularly tough because the community isn’t simply defined by a single concept like sexuality (gay, lesbian, bi, asexual, etc.) gender (trans, non-binary, etc.) or sex (intersex, etc.). Some academic institutions have used terms like “sexual and gender minorities” (GSM), which I think is a huge improvement, although even then we see that term evolve as more factors come to light (“gender, sexual and romantic minorities”, GSRM). Are there any criticisms of those terms we should be aware of?

  • I’ve heard using “queer” as an umbrella term remains controversial for its historical use as a slur, so using it in wider contexts might be inappropriate?

  • I’ve heard “rainbow community” once or twice, which seems is clear enough that it doesn’t need an introduction, with the great symbolism of a rainbow covering all the colors. But I wonder if rainbow symbolism is considered inclusive, or considered specific to certain subgroups. Especially how the “progress flag” contrasts against the rainbow flag.

  • Any others you like?

…

I ask this question out of ignorance: while I am part of my local community, we generally aren’t very familiar with the broader community in other countries and their diverse perspectives yet. So I hope I haven’t accidentally said anything careless!

Also sorry if this is comm is specifically for trans questions. Let me know if I should ask this somewhere else instead, I just didn’t want to put it on a general instance and have too many over-confident outsiders and trolls answering.

  • FiletternavnEnglish
    4·
    10 hours ago

    Adding to the pile of support for queer. It’s a reclaimed term. We’ve grown to use it so much in a positive light that we’ve stripped it of the power it previously had for hate. Everyone I know who is queer in any way is quite happy and supportive of the term, and we use it pretty often in conversation. Despite its historical use as a slur, if someone were to attention to use it in a hateful way, it would offend me no more than if they used “gay” in the same way. And I’m sure we can both agree that isn’t a slur, nor is it controversial. Of course, that’s simply my opinion on the matter. What I’ve seen anecdotally, however, is that basically no one in the community really treats it as controversial.