"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agoTRUCKIN'lemmy.worldimagemessage-square97linkfedilinkarrow-up1602
arrow-up1602imageTRUCKIN'lemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square97linkfedilink
minus-squareSoleInvictuslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·24 hours agoI have no concerns if he wants to force feed himself grain mash in the privacy of his own home. I draw the line at involving innocent waterfowl, though.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·22 hours agoI’ll go one step further - even if the goose is convicted in a court of law they still shouldn’t be subjected to this.
minus-squareHupf@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·21 hours agoWouldn’t a goose be convicted by a court of kangaroos?
I have no concerns if he wants to force feed himself grain mash in the privacy of his own home. I draw the line at involving innocent waterfowl, though.
I’ll go one step further - even if the goose is convicted in a court of law they still shouldn’t be subjected to this.
Wouldn’t a goose be convicted by a court of kangaroos?