In an extensive new chat with Deadline, Warner Bros. CEOs Mike De Luca and Pam Abdy have spilled the beans on a handful of new projects in the works at
Come and get your recycled franchise, nostalgia-bait slop! We can’t be fucked to pay any creative talent to write stories about anything new or interesting, so here are some of your favorite characters’ zombies that we acquired being dangled in front of you.
I’m about y’all, but I’m really looking forward to Barbie 9 and Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice!
Well in the original saying it three times again puts him back in the model. So really, looking at it, t looks like they summoned him and put him back a couple time. He would currently be summoned and 2 more away from being put back.
I agree with your sentiment, but the studies show people will go see what’s familiar, even if it doesn’t end up being very good.
It’s a safer bet for studios
Absolutely, and that’s the problem. Studios optimize for low-risk because art is just an investment vehicle for them, which is directly at-odds with what art actually should be: creative expression.
Yeah, being a for profit business guarantees they won’t be about creative expression that doesn’t have a monetary incentive in the short term or long term.
Even the examples of a studio financing a movie because someone in power wants it to exist despite knowing it won’t make bank have an underlying expectation that other projects the director will work on (or has in the past) generate more revenue than is lost on that project.
There is a difference between recycling an existing story by re-imagining it and throwing out generic slop with a nostalgia filter. The Terminator and Halloween are the same story if you ignore the details. Indiana Jones was an homage to the old adventure serials.
Having the same overall structure can make something the same story at the surface level, but how it is implemented is what makes it fresh and original. Nostalgia bait is not putting the effort into making something new and fun, but instead focusing on how they can cram member berries in so people can remember the better movie as a distraction from the slop they are watching.
Not all movies with nostalgia moments are nostalgia bait either. Good sequels exist too.
Come and get your recycled franchise, nostalgia-bait slop! We can’t be fucked to pay any creative talent to write stories about anything new or interesting, so here are some of your favorite characters’ zombies that we acquired being dangled in front of you.
I’m about y’all, but I’m really looking forward to Barbie 9 and Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice!
You just summoned, like, 5⅓ Beetlejuices. Beetles Juice?
Well in the original saying it three times again puts him back in the model. So really, looking at it, t looks like they summoned him and put him back a couple time. He would currently be summoned and 2 more away from being put back.
I wonder, if multiple people called him at the same time, would it rip up the space-beetle continuum?
Biggie Smalls, Biggie Smalls, Biggie Smalls!
MUTHAFU-
Banger comment.
I agree with your sentiment, but the studies show people will go see what’s familiar, even if it doesn’t end up being very good. It’s a safer bet for studios
Absolutely, and that’s the problem. Studios optimize for low-risk because art is just an investment vehicle for them, which is directly at-odds with what art actually should be: creative expression.
Yeah, being a for profit business guarantees they won’t be about creative expression that doesn’t have a monetary incentive in the short term or long term.
Even the examples of a studio financing a movie because someone in power wants it to exist despite knowing it won’t make bank have an underlying expectation that other projects the director will work on (or has in the past) generate more revenue than is lost on that project.
And everybody knows that going for the safe bet is the sure-fire formula for a classic that will return profits to the studio for decades.
There are no new stories. Haven’t been for millennia.
Stop asking for re-skinned old stories.
There is a difference between recycling an existing story by re-imagining it and throwing out generic slop with a nostalgia filter. The Terminator and Halloween are the same story if you ignore the details. Indiana Jones was an homage to the old adventure serials.
Having the same overall structure can make something the same story at the surface level, but how it is implemented is what makes it fresh and original. Nostalgia bait is not putting the effort into making something new and fun, but instead focusing on how they can cram member berries in so people can remember the better movie as a distraction from the slop they are watching.
Not all movies with nostalgia moments are nostalgia bait either. Good sequels exist too.
Exactly true. But celebrating a new coat of paint, instead of cleaning the old paint, is kind of silly. That’s my point.