I dont know why my comment got removed. But the Ewigkeitsklausel is not in need of court decision. It in itself says that “Any amendment to this Basic Law which affects the division of the Federation into States, the fundamental participation of the States in legislation or the principles laid down in Articles 1 and 20 is inadmissible.”.
It also takes a 2/3 majority to change anything in the basic law (which is basicly our constitution).
Seperation of power and the federalism is so big that one would have to take over EVERY COURT and EVERY STATE and federal with a single majority. The elections are also very set appart that there basicly is always an election somewhere from how i experience it.
The courts arent appointed by politicians. Not even the consitutional court, that got changed last year with heavy disagreement from AfD and BSW
I dont know why my comment got removed. But the Ewigkeitsklausel is not in need of court decision. It in itself says that “Any amendment to this Basic Law which affects the division of the Federation into States, the fundamental participation of the States in legislation or the principles laid down in Articles 1 and 20 is inadmissible.”.
It also takes a 2/3 majority to change anything in the basic law (which is basicly our constitution).
Seperation of power and the federalism is so big that one would have to take over EVERY COURT and EVERY STATE and federal with a single majority. The elections are also very set appart that there basicly is always an election somewhere from how i experience it. The courts arent appointed by politicians. Not even the consitutional court, that got changed last year with heavy disagreement from AfD and BSW