• katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    Isn’t Signal still centralised? Why use it over Matrix? (genuine question)

    • 486@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      4 days ago

      It is, but Signal and Matrix aren’t really all that similar. Matrix’s privacy is pretty atrocious. It stores tons of meta data about users all over the place. That’s the exact opposite of what Signal does.

      • aeternum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        yup. signal devs/servers have NO access at all to anything about the conversations.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 days ago

      Signal is person to person messaging with groups on the side (ala WhatsApp)

      Matrix is groups with person to person on the side (ala Discord)

    • devfuuu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 days ago

      Matrix leaks a ton of metadata and for normal users the clients are still very much in the sucking phase. Signal being centralized changes nothing about its security when the freaking servers can’t see anything about the messages. It literally is the most secure way to communicate out there, period.

      • katy ✨
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Thanks; is leaking metadata just a consequence of the decentralized nature or is it something specific to how Matrix was made? Maybe I’ll try out Signal (I’ve been looking for some alternatives) but I don’t like how they’re based in America/5 Eyes, even if they are encrypted.

        • Azzu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          But yeah, that’s the thing, it doesn’t matter where it is based when there can’t be any information gleamed from it.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Signal literally couldn’t give away your communications if they wanted to, everyone who disagrees with the way things are going should be using it.

      • itslilith
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        It literally is the most secure way to communicate out there, period.

        It’s the most secure reasonably popular and user friendly way to communicate. By having unique identifiers and a central server a determined state actor could still figure out who is chatting with whom, and when (but the content of the messages is secure)

        There are other protocols out there, like SimpleX or Briar, but they operate on a threat profile way beyond most people need, and they are less intuitive than Signal

      • Rob1992@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        There’s some people trying to run messaging services over TOR, no idea if much is gained from it

    • sith@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      Because its a more user friendly experience. Your grandma can use it with no hustle. Matrix is more complicated UX and also much slower and buggier (at least if you use Element and matrix.org). Ive actually started to prefer Delta Chat over Matrix.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s more private and secure, and it’s easier to use/recommend.

      Matrix stores all metadata, and most all of it makes it’s way to the matrix.org (default instance) server and is subject to dragnet subpoenas. It’s also complicated to use, incredibly slow, and resource-intensive.