Nemeski@lemm.ee to Python@programming.dev · 1 day agoPython 3.14 Lands A New Interpreter With 3~30% Faster Python Codewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up158
arrow-up158external-linkPython 3.14 Lands A New Interpreter With 3~30% Faster Python Codewww.phoronix.comNemeski@lemm.ee to Python@programming.dev · 1 day agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareThotDragonlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 day agoError in the Lemmy post title. Approximately 3% to 30% improvement. Not a 330% improvement.
minus-square_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·edit-21 day agoThe article quotes the docs which say negative 3 to 30, which is weird but honest. I wonder if the - is a typo, but probably not.
minus-squareVoroxpete@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoI guess if you’re measuring in execution time, negative would be an improvement.
minus-squareSatouKazuma@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 day ago330% would be crazy impressive.
minus-squareFiery@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 day agoBreaking: python now faster than assembly
minus-squaredeadcream@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 day agoNah, 330% improvement won’t even bring it close to JavaScript. Python is slow.
Error in the Lemmy post title. Approximately 3% to 30% improvement. Not a 330% improvement.
The article quotes the docs which say negative 3 to 30, which is weird but honest.
I wonder if the - is a typo, but probably not.
I guess if you’re measuring in execution time, negative would be an improvement.
330% would be crazy impressive.
Breaking: python now faster than assembly
Nah, 330% improvement won’t even bring it close to JavaScript. Python is slow.
Like a snail… slow but cool.