strangething@feddit.online to 196English · 2 months agoRulefeddit.onlineimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1489
arrow-up1489imageRulefeddit.onlinestrangething@feddit.online to 196English · 2 months agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareGormadtlinkfedilinkarrow-up35·2 months agoYou see you just have this special smoke detector and an actual detector in the same room, no one’s gonna notice.
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·2 months agoThe amount of places I’ve lived with old, busted, hard-wired smoke alarms replaced with newer battery operated ones.
minus-squarenightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoDid you check them for hard points underneath?
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoHuh? I’ve never done what is shown in the OP, was just pointing out that redundant, old smoke detectors are pretty common. Therefore, it won’t arouse suspicion if you have two in a room.
minus-squaremipadaitu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 months agoI think the fingerprints and smudges are going to be more telling than a second detector.
You see you just have this special smoke detector and an actual detector in the same room, no one’s gonna notice.
The amount of places I’ve lived with old, busted, hard-wired smoke alarms replaced with newer battery operated ones.
Did you check them for hard points underneath?
Huh? I’ve never done what is shown in the OP, was just pointing out that redundant, old smoke detectors are pretty common. Therefore, it won’t arouse suspicion if you have two in a room.
I think the fingerprints and smudges are going to be more telling than a second detector.