• Zero22xx
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Honestly I’m gonna go against what people usually say and say that Arch is better to start with than Ubuntu, as long as you’re not afraid of command line or editing txt files. Whether it’s Arch or Ubuntu, as a noob you’re going to be doing a lot of wiki reading and copying and pasting of commands.

    Personally though, a big difference between the two I found is that after a couple of years of copying and pasting commands in Ubuntu, I still didn’t really understand anything about how Linux works behind the scenes. Whereas Arch had me feeling like I too could be a sysadmin, if I felt like it, within a week.

    And maybe things are different these days with Ubuntu, it’s been a few years, but I find that Arch has a way more enthusiastic and helpful user base. And the Arch wiki is practically a bible. Whereas searching for problems and solutions in Ubuntu can feel a bit like searching for problems and solutions in Windows, where you’ll probably get copy pasted generic solutions or someone telling you to restart your PC.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Arch as a first distro is an interesting choice.

      But likely fr better than my first distro, Slackware.

      I had known about the Church of the Subgenius and then heard that there was a Linux distro based on that…

      At the time, the wikis were not really up to the task…

      These days I run Mint on my writing laptop, and unfortunately am back to Windows on my gaming rig.

      But might swap back to Gaurda for gaming…