Perhaps the most interesting part of the article:

  • Catoblepas
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Any spark that wasn’t dealt with immediately during Santa Ana’s that severe (60-100 mph gusts, constant wind around 40 mph), and during a severe drought, AND with humidity below 20% was going to blow up.

    It is wonky that it happened in January, because historically that’s when we’re getting rain, but that hasn’t happened this water year. For all practical purposes we’re still in the dry season.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, but they caught a guy with a torch blower trying to start fires. I don’t know if it’s arson or not. I hope not, this is horrific.

      • Catoblepas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, it sounds like he is responsible probably for the Kenneth fire, which started after the winds had died down a bit. Still enough wind to kick it off (regular 20 mph gusts), but it wasn’t hurricane force winds like Tuesday when the Palisades and Eaton fires started. I’m skeptical that any arsonist is fire happy enough to also get clonked in the head by flying debris.

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I can see why you’re pretty confident, but I don’t think you can be 100% confident that these weren’t all started. We’ll have to wait and see. They’re usually pretty great about figuring out what happened.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s honestly really impressive. The majority of the evidence has been incinerated by thousand-degree fires and covered in sea water and firefighting foam by the time investigators get to it.