• @meatMech
    link
    1111 months ago

    1 has gotta be the norm, right? Like, whenever I see a movie adaptation of a novel I’ve always heard from people who’re mad because the film doesn’t line up with their mental image

    • @Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      It’s a really poorly communicated image. Less detailed visualization isn’t literally a washed out version of the thing, it’s more that the details only exist if you’re actively thinking about them, rather than your brain subconsciously imagining all the details immediately.

      • @Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        511 months ago

        Yea I don’t really “see” an apple, it’s more that I can pick out one infinitesimally portion of it at any moment. So if I think about the leaf I can construct the leaf, but not the rest, and it is constantly changing as I move to other parts of the apple.

        I wouldn’t really say I see anything, it’s more abstract than that and hard to convey.

        • @Cross@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          I think I’m the same way. Like if I imagine an ornate doorknob from an old temple I can see it in a general view, and I can focus on the details one little bit at a time, but I can’t picture the entire thing at once with detail. It’s also not like I’m seeing it, it’s fluid and honestly somewhat difficult to focus on.

      • @meatMech
        link
        111 months ago

        Oh, okay that makes way more sense and does sound a lot more how most brains would work. Fascinating stuff

    • Mewtwo
      link
      211 months ago

      Same, I did the same for banana and orange, I don’t need an picture to conjure the image in my head.

    • @Andiloor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      I’m a 1 but I feel like I gotta see a prototype of the object first. I’m better at recall than conjuring (but I assume most people would be?)