• @nan
    link
    English
    21
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1411 months ago

      Yes, and they’ve made some profit-driven decisions, such as pocket integration, but never on the level of what google does.

      That’s why I’ve said they are far from perfect (but the best we have).

    • LEX
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That’s what non-profit means. You reinvest the profit back into the project rather than pocket the money. It doesn’t literally mean “no profit”.

      • @nan
        link
        English
        12
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • @steakmeout@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          It is a non-profit.

          The Mozilla Corporation was established on August 3, 2005, to handle the revenue-related operations of the Mozilla Foundation. As a non-profit, the Mozilla Foundation is limited in terms of the types and amounts of revenue it can have. The Mozilla Corporation, as a taxable organization (essentially, a commercial operation), does not have to comply with such strict rules. Upon its creation, the Mozilla Corporation took over several areas from the Mozilla Foundation, including coordination and integration of the development of Firefox and Thunderbird (by the global free software community) and the management of relationships with businesses.

          • @nan
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            deleted by creator

        • LEX
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          So, a non-profit that skirts the rules, basically. Good to know.