kopper [they/them] to 196 · kuukausi sittenruleskymedia.d.on-t.workimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1136
arrow-up1136imageruleskymedia.d.on-t.workkopper [they/them] to 196 · kuukausi sittenmessage-square25fedilink
minus-squaremegopielinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·kuukausi sittenIt’s repeating the same cycle, for profit social media will inevitably reach the same fate.
minus-squarekrimsonbunlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·30 päivää sittenhow do they make money? there’s no ads and it’s free
minus-squareTriflingToad@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·29 päivää sittenYouTube was like that too
minus-squarekrimsonbunlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·29 päivää sitteneven if they suddenly put ads on it (which would be stupid since no ads is one of their main selling points) it’d still be better than twitter/threads
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·28 päivää sittenPhase one enshittification. They’re burning VC money to acquire users, who they will then betray.
minus-squaremorphballganon@mtgzone.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·27 päivää sittenSo, baseless speculation?
minus-squaregfle@szmer.infolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·27 päivää sittenI’d rather say that it’s “learning from history of similar services”. Facebook also seemed nice in the beginning.
It’s repeating the same cycle, for profit social media will inevitably reach the same fate.
how do they make money? there’s no ads and it’s free
YouTube was like that too
even if they suddenly put ads on it (which would be stupid since no ads is one of their main selling points) it’d still be better than twitter/threads
for now
Phase one enshittification. They’re burning VC money to acquire users, who they will then betray.
So, baseless speculation?
I’d rather say that it’s “learning from history of similar services”. Facebook also seemed nice in the beginning.