• Womdat10
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    And how does that change the fact that the post says there aren’t any? Last time I checked 1 is more than 0.

    • nomous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

      Unless you have weird double standards and only apply them when it’s convenient.

      • Womdat10
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        That doesn’t work in this context, if one person murders someone, and another murders 2 people, both are still murderers, one just is a worse murderer(as in more evil, not as in worse at committing murder)

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          That doesn’t work in this context

          one just is a worse murderer

          Seems like it works just fine.

          • Womdat10
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            So are you agreeing with what I said about both people being murderers or not? Because of you are then you agree that it isn’t a wash, and if you disagree then you are fucking stupid.

      • Cleggory@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

        It’s called mental gymnastics to think “two wrongs make a right.”

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s called a strawman to build an argument that was never made and then attack it.

          • Cleggory@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            You didn’t make this absurd claim?:

            If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

            If you are victimized, you believe you then have the right to also victimize “to cancel it out”?

            • nomous@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Context is important, that’s how we continue the conversation.

              If Candidate A is a genocidal maniac, and Candidate B is a genocidal maniac. It’s effectively a wash and pointless to say “well Candidate A supports genocide!”

              Hope this clarified my meaning.

              • Cleggory@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Criticizing genocide is pointless if both major candidates support it.

                Apathy has paved a basis for genocide throughout history, your view is not novel nor beneficial.

                • nomous@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Grandoise words that mean little and contribute nothing but obviously you love the smell of your own *farts so go off.

                  Whatever helps you sleep at night