cm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoIt's coming! :(lemmy.worldimagemessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up1815
arrow-up1815imageIt's coming! :(lemmy.worldcm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square118fedilink
minus-squarecqstlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·16 hours agoThere will be no improvement with browsers until the introduction of one with a strong copyleft license.
minus-squareLarmyOfLone@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-213 hours agoI’m curious, how would copyleft license improve the quality of browser development? That is really about funding and management.
minus-squareareyouevenreal@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·14 hours agoDon’t Firefox and Chromium already have that?
minus-squareunemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 hour agoChromium is fully entrenched. “strong copyleft”? Even Microsoft bent to the will of Chromium. And Firefox is just a silly thing where people like me hang on
minus-squareareyouevenreal@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 minutes agoIf I remember correctly it’s under a copy left license which makes sense given it’s ultimately a derivative of KHTML.
There will be no improvement with browsers until the introduction of one with a strong copyleft license.
I’m curious, how would copyleft license improve the quality of browser development? That is really about funding and management.
doesn’t gpl exist? its quite strong.
Don’t Firefox and Chromium already have that?
Chromium is fully entrenched. “strong copyleft”? Even Microsoft bent to the will of Chromium. And Firefox is just a silly thing where people like me hang on
If I remember correctly it’s under a copy left license which makes sense given it’s ultimately a derivative of KHTML.