On so many different news items, threads, etc. People are the first to claim pretty much anyone who has made a mistake, or does something they disagree with deserves to die.

Like, do some people not have the capability to empathise and realise they might have been in a similar place if they were born in a different environment…

I genuinely understand, you think a politician who has lead to countless deaths, a war criminal, or a mass rapists deserves to die.

But here people say it for stuff that falls way below the bar.

A contracted logger of a rainforest (who knows if they have the money / opportunity to support their family another way). Deserves to die.

A civilian of Nazi germany of whom we know nothing about their collaboration/agreement with the regime. Deserves to die.

Some person who was a drug dealer and then served their time. Deserves to die.

Like I don’t get it? Are people not able to imagine the kind of situations that create these people, and that it’s not impossible to imagine the large majority of people in these positions if born in a different environment?

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “AOC slams Trump.”

    They may as well be writing articles that say:

    “Trump fucking body slams Biden.”

    The rhetorical devices are out of control.

    • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      True that. And you reminded me a tidbit of human nature, that interferes in this situation:

      If you mince words to make something look stronger, weaker, better, worse than it is, plenty people fall for it. Because they care too much about how something is said (the words) and too little about what is being said (the discourse).

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        What’s really crazy to me is that it’s not impossible to use a rhetorical device but still have it be rooted in reality. Like you can say “AOC doles out biting critique to GOP leadership” or something and it still allows the use of “biting” but is still living in the reality of that referring to a critique she made with words and ideas.

        • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Possible? Yes. Desirable? No; at least, not for most news sources - the extreme sells better than the simply informative, and often this lack of precision is how they manipulate your views towards a certain subject.