• BluJay320
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wanting people to not vote for the only option that can beat Trump?

    Wonder who that benefits… 🤔🤔🤔

      • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s the only realistic option at this point. You can still protest the genocide in Gaza AFTER the election (and I fully support you doing so, Hell I might even meet you at one), but look at it this way: if Kamala wins, you have a chance to make a change over there, but if Trump wins again, every Palestinian is as good as dead. Do I like either option? No! Do I think our elections are a good system? No! Am I going to vote for Kamala anyway? Yes! Because at this point, the choice is between shooting ourselves in the foot or in the temple

      • Deestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 months ago

        That is a valid question in isolation, but bringing it up in discussions on where to vote is not leading to discussions or actionable improvements. It only functions to push voter disenfrachisement.

        Not saying it’s your intention, but it is your effect.

        Voting least bad is important. Don’t discourage it.

        Working for better voting options is also important. Do push for that too, but find a constructive setting for it.