• EldritchFeminity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    There’s nothing wrong with it, per se. As they say, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Just trying to put in perspective the technological difference between the 90s and today that makes the 90s “ancient” and how systems are still running on that old tech today.

    The 90s was only about 30 years ago, but when you think of what computers running Windows 95 could do then compared to systems today, it’s like a different era. It’s no small wonder that banking systems can’t keep your accounts up to date in real time when major pieces of them were designed before the internet was more than a DARPA project.

    When my dad was in college for engineering, the college had their own computer, and he remembers going into the clean room to put his punch cards into it for classes. When I was a kid in the 90s, I remember being blown away by a flight sim on my dad’s Mac. Today, I can grab my HTC Vive and be right in the cockpit of a fighter jet in something like DCS. Compared to when I was a kid, I might as well be on the holodeck from Star Trek. Dick Tracy’s wrist computer went from science fiction to something people use just so they don’t have to pull their computer out of their pocket.

    The only thing that can outpace technology is internet meme culture.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      I loathe that quote, it’s so much more nuanced.

      A program from the 90s whose task is just to run a piece of machinery? Not broke, no problem

      A program from the 90s supporting the bulk of an entire countrys economy that literally can’t handle real-time transactions and causes numerous knock on effects as a result? Time replace the shit

      • EldritchFeminity
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        It’s because companies consider something that would be expensive to fix as “not broke.”