• rarWars
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 months ago

    The percentages for 2016 only add up to 97, and the 40% bar is longer than the 41% of 2012.

    • Klaymore@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Maybe 3% voted for a third party, and because they aren’t shown the other bars were expanded to fill the entire space

      • rarWars
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        They could’ve done a little green sliver like they did for 1980.

    • FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just like the sub on reddit, the data in DataIsBeautiful apparently doesn’t actually have to be beautiful.

    • flora_explora@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also, sometimes it say “won” or lost" behind the candidates, sometimes there is an asterisk, but for many entries, there is no information who won and who lost?

      • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        The asterisk is explained up top, and they only indicate who won when it is backwards from the popular vote total.