• AltheaHunter
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 month ago

    I fucking hate that this is a thing. “We can’t stop doing this useless and/or detrimental thing, look at all the work it makes for other people to do!!!” Absolutely bonkers that it’s just a standard political argument.

      • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        The worst part is if people only worked two or three days a week corporations would still be profitable and everyone would have a job.

        • smb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          i once heared something like this:

          “the idea of having more than those who have nothing is the very only reason shareholders can ever imagine someone would work for at all, thus they also falsely believe they would do something good when enforcing this by removing everything from those who already are vulnerable and thus create a living example of how you would end when you don’t help them rob even more.”

      • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        What’s wild is that if you replaced them with a single payer system or whatever else, you would still have a lot of bureaucratic work that needs to get done by the new system, so most if not all of those jobs would still exist - they would just shift from trying to deny people care to trying to connect people to care.

      • vonxylofon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        It shouldn’t exist? I’d like to see you pay for your medical expenses out of pocket.

        P. S. No, I am not American.

        • Gormadt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          Here in the states when we say “medical insurance shouldn’t exist” what we mean is “the medical insurance industry shouldn’t exist”

          Basically the cluster fuck of insurance companies we have now shouldn’t exist, we should just have a single payer type system where medical expenses are paid for through our tax dollars. In its current state it’s a nightmare to deal with.

        • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          A lot of private insurance in the US amounts to paying a couple hundred monthly to have the insurance and then they deny payment for basically anything and everything. So you pay them to pay out of pocket anyway.

          Just got state insurance which covers everything, but very few offices accept it.

          So yeah. Insurance in the US is super fucked up and people go without healthcare, even if they have insurance because they simply can’t afford it.

        • not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          Yeah I guess the kind of Single Payer model I prefer can be conceptualised as “insurance.” But it feels more like health care is taxpayer funded. The similarity to insurance is just details for the detail nerds.

    • BurningRiver@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      “The government made 25% of my district unemployed, why didn’t I get reelected?”

      Ask it from that side and you have your answer.

      • AltheaHunter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wasn’t asking a question. I understand why politicians do it, I just think it’s a sign of a terrible system.